78
63
33
Level1
1
0
之前我同朋友都泥呢一間到食過既....之前D野食感覺麻麻....不過今次我同D FD睇完戲諗住食D野點知經過呢間野....諗緊入唔入去食但係我地實在大肚餓啦...我地決定入去食....點知一打開本Menud菜色轉左...有好多菜色都未見過跟我地就叫野食啦蘿蔔千絲酥,呢個就好好味....千絲酥唔油,入面夠晒熱,好新鮮。石窩魚 ok 好似食鐵板燒咁....d香味好勁...未上枱都已經聞到陣味...好香荷葉飯 好正...上一次食果個荷葉飯好唔得....食次呢個好好食...好入味 值得推介天麻燉魚頭 服務生推介我地試...我地就決定試下, 好重天麻味....d湯好清甜(值得一試)冇去呢間野一排...估唔到轉左新菜牌同菜色d服務好左...我諗我會再去多次
Read full review
之前我同朋友都泥呢一間到食過既....
之前D野食感覺麻麻....
不過今次我同D FD睇完戲諗住食D野
點知經過呢間野....諗緊入唔入去食
但係我地實在大肚餓啦...
我地決定入去食....點知一打開本Menu
d菜色轉左...有好多菜色都未見過
跟我地就叫野食啦



蘿蔔千絲酥,呢個就好好味....千絲酥唔油,入面夠晒熱,好新鮮。
石窩魚 ok 好似食鐵板燒咁....d香味好勁...未上枱都已經聞到陣味...好香

荷葉飯 好正...上一次食果個荷葉飯好唔得....食次呢個好好食...好入味 值得推介

天麻燉魚頭 服務生推介我地試...我地就決定試下, 好重天麻味....d湯好清甜(值得一試)

冇去呢間野一排...估唔到轉左新菜牌同菜色
d服務好左...
我諗我會再去多次
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-11-29
Waiting Time
1 Minutes (Dine In)
Recommended Dishes
  • 石窩魚
  • 荷葉飯
  • 天麻燉魚頭
Level2
23
0
2010-11-16 20 views
工作關係.是日遠渡中環.黃昏時順道相約愛人在銅鑼灣時代醫肚.愛人話去翡翠食.但當到了翡翠门口時.看見前少少有間利小館記起它是利苑的副線.應該有水準呱.于是行前入去.見裝修簡單.似想走平民化(合我).坐下愛人急急點餸(因我全日未有東西落肚)小籠包 ok 但比不上翡翠及霸王山莊芥末沙律 不是我杯茶(大多醬)茶薰鴨 食不出同燒鴨有何分別(價錢就有分別)荷葉飯 不錯竹庶矛根 太甜夫妻腎片 可以拉麵 口感差少少煎餃 算不錯了一共叫了八樣.但我張枱好細.當時6:15.店內一半客人都未有.我倆口子就迫住迫住食(心想稍後可能好多人).仲迫過麵檔.好掛住翡翠的大卞位呀.到走時7:10店內都係一半客人多少少..我倆口子就迫住迫住食左一餐.(銅鑼灣寸金尺土)
Read full review



工作關係.是日遠渡中環.黃昏時順道相約愛人在銅鑼灣時代醫肚.愛人話去翡翠食.但當到了翡翠门口時.看見前少少有間利小館
記起它是利苑的副線.應該有水準呱.于是行前入去.見裝修簡單.似想走平民化(合我).坐下愛人急急點餸(因我全日未有東西落肚)


小籠包 ok 但比不上翡翠及霸王山莊
芥末沙律 不是我杯茶(大多醬)
茶薰鴨 食不出同燒鴨有何分別(價錢就有分別)
荷葉飯 不錯
竹庶矛根 太甜
夫妻腎片 可以
拉麵 口感差少少
煎餃 算不錯了
一共叫了八樣.但我張枱好細.當時6:15.店內一半客人都未有.我倆口子就迫住迫住食

(心想稍後可能好多人).
仲迫過麵檔.好掛住翡翠的大卞位呀.到走時7:10店內都係一半客人多少少.
.我倆口子就迫住迫住食左一餐.(銅鑼灣寸金尺土)

(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-10-20
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$148
Level4
2010-11-07 35 views
有時都係以品牌去選擇,今次試下這個副牌。冷盤要左醉雞,係隻雞脾黎,肉幾滑下,不過暖暖地,奇怪,無咩酒味,古怪,好普普通通的醉雞。燒排骨,得九件,睇落色水唔錯,燒骨味道夠,係真的覺得少了點。小籠包,皮厚厚,肉餡唔太特別,肉汁勁多,其實唔係多就好,今次覺得過左火。娃娃菜,D菇有D苦。菜肉雲吞麵,用上係日式拉麵,見張點心紙都係寫拉麵,無言,只是好奇點解用上日式拉麵。雪梨茶,見有凍供應,要杯,原來只係唔熱,唔係凍。杏仁茶,只有輕輕杏仁味,中規中矩。以食物水準計,真係跟同系集團水準有很大差距,對於服務也不太滿意,收我這價錢,沒有喊臉算是這樣。
Read full review

有時都係以品牌去選擇,今次試下這個副牌。

醉雞
27 views
0 likes
0 comments

冷盤要左醉雞,係隻雞脾黎,肉幾滑下,不過暖暖地,奇怪,無咩酒味,古怪,好普普通通的醉雞。

燒排骨
17 views
0 likes
0 comments

燒排骨,得九件,睇落色水唔錯,燒骨味道夠,係真的覺得少了點。

厚皮小籠包
50 views
0 likes
0 comments

小籠包,皮厚厚,肉餡唔太特別,肉汁勁多,其實唔係多就好,今次覺得過左火。

娃娃菜
14 views
0 likes
0 comments

娃娃菜,D菇有D苦。

雲吞拉麵
21 views
0 likes
0 comments

菜肉雲吞麵,用上係日式拉麵,見張點心紙都係寫拉麵,無言,只是好奇點解用上日式拉麵。

"凍"雪梨茶
14 views
0 likes
0 comments

雪梨茶,見有凍供應,要杯,原來只係唔熱,唔係凍。

杏仁茶
16 views
0 likes
0 comments

杏仁茶,只有輕輕杏仁味,中規中矩。

以食物水準計,真係跟同系集團水準有很大差距,對於服務也不太滿意,收我這價錢,沒有喊臉算是這樣。
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$140 (Dinner)
Level4
241
0
2010-10-27 5 views
想食下中菜,離不開酒樓架啦,但同朋友想傾下計黎呢度都幾好;加上之前好多報章都有介紹過,今雲就親身試試看。要左個招牌菜冰燒三層肉 (即係燒肉),68蚊得果9件仔,又冇咩好取之處,快餐店既燒腩仔可能仲好味。皮真係好脆既,但肉唔香,而且夠夠肥美 (燒肉應該有肥有瘦架嘛),好似得啖肉,但都唔係好味呢...小食要左蘿蔔千絲酥,呢個就好好味。 千絲酥唔油,夠晒熱,好新鮮。酥皮內除左有蘿蔔絲之外,仲有個蘿蔔汁,濕濕地唔會乾身好熱氣,而且果汁好好味,調味剛剛好!! 讚!! 主菜要荷葉污糟雞,雞件好滑,但甜甜左少少同冇咩荷香,中規中矩吧~飯類就要左蒜香金貝吳炒飯,即是蒜蓉瑤柱菜粒炒飯。個樣真係好掂! 但一食就唔得啦...... 飯粒係冇做到一粒粒,但有點兒過左火,炒到 飯粒好硬好難咬,真係少D牙力都唔得架!! 味道方面都幾好,有好多瑤柱,但係都係好韌!! 飯又係咁,佢唔係翻叮翻炒架嘛....總括黎講,呢餐係又貴又唔好食既,以佢既價錢可以食得好好。而且菜式方面都冇咩特別,唔專,仲有好多上海野,同一般酒樓無異,但就貴好好多!!! 真係唔抵!! 又冇服務!! 咁樣海好難做得住果喎!
Read full review
想食下中菜,離不開酒樓架啦,但同朋友想傾下計黎呢度都幾好;加上之前好多報章都有介紹過,今雲就親身試試看。

要左個招牌菜冰燒三層肉 (即係燒肉),68蚊得果9件仔,又冇咩好取之處,快餐店既燒腩仔可能仲好味。
皮真係好脆既,但肉唔香,而且夠夠肥美 (燒肉應該有肥有瘦架嘛),好似得啖肉,但都唔係好味呢...


小食要左蘿蔔千絲酥,呢個就好好味。
千絲酥唔油,夠晒熱,好新鮮。酥皮內除左有蘿蔔絲之外,仲有個蘿蔔汁,濕濕地唔會乾身好熱氣,而且果汁好好味,調味剛剛好!! 讚!!


主菜要荷葉污糟雞,雞件好滑,但甜甜左少少同冇咩荷香,中規中矩吧~

飯類就要左蒜香金貝吳炒飯,即是蒜蓉瑤柱菜粒炒飯。個樣真係好掂! 但一食就唔得啦......
飯粒係冇做到一粒粒,但有點兒過左火,炒到 飯粒好硬好難咬,真係少D牙力都唔得架!!
味道方面都幾好,有好多瑤柱,但係都係好韌!!
飯又係咁,佢唔係翻叮翻炒架嘛....


總括黎講,呢餐係又貴又唔好食既,以佢既價錢可以食得好好。而且菜式方面都冇咩特別,唔專,仲有好多上海野,同一般酒樓無異,但就貴好好多!!!
真係唔抵!! 又冇服務!! 咁樣海好難做得住果喎!
12 views
0 likes
0 comments
9 views
0 likes
0 comments
33 views
0 likes
0 comments
26 views
0 likes
0 comments
13 views
0 likes
0 comments
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-10-13
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$100 (Dinner)
Recommended Dishes
  • 蘿蔔千絲酥
Level3
30
0
2010-10-21 5 views
屋企人睇雜誌見到呢間話想試下, 即刻打去訂定位, 估唔到假日都有訂位服務. 坐位方面比較迫, 枱與枱之間好近, 所以都比較嘈. 當晚點咗以下食品:煄魚 - 肉厚味濃, 唔錯荷香污糟雞 - 以為咩咁特別, 原來只係荷葉蒸雞, 份量唔多, 雞肉尚算嫩滑紅燒獅子頭 - 味道一般小籠包 - 皮薄多汁, 食完忍唔住再encore一籠蜂巢芋盒 - 味道同酒樓芋角差唔多擔擔麵 - 好惹味, 值得一試以後又多一個食小籠包既好地方~
Read full review
屋企人睇雜誌見到呢間話想試下, 即刻打去訂定位, 估唔到假日都有訂位服務. 坐位方面比較迫, 枱與枱之間好近, 所以都比較嘈. 當晚點咗以下食品:

煄魚 - 肉厚味濃, 唔錯
荷香污糟雞 - 以為咩咁特別, 原來只係荷葉蒸雞, 份量唔多, 雞肉尚算嫩滑
紅燒獅子頭 - 味道一般
小籠包 - 皮薄多汁, 食完忍唔住再encore一籠
蜂巢芋盒 - 味道同酒樓芋角差唔多
擔擔麵 - 好惹味, 值得一試

以後又多一個食小籠包既好地方~

(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$80 (Dinner)
Recommended Dishes
  • 小籠包
  • 擔擔麵
Level3
49
0
2010-09-25 10 views
第一次跟家人到此晚餐,屋企人話食評都唔錯,試下啦...叫左以下食物︰- 生煎包︰包的皮好軟熟,D 餡OK,唔算太油,個底可以煎 lone 少少- 小籠包︰賣相麻麻地,個整好似散散地咁,但肉汁好甜,個皮唔算太厚或太薄,但係食得出D肉係較肥的... 味道都OK- 羅白絲酥︰呢個幾好味,唔油- 擔擔面︰呢個係最好食,唔會得麻醬味,有少少辣,好食...- 梨山醬骨煲︰呢個味都好好食,好送飯,我以為梨山係酸汁,但原來係有豉油、蒜頭..- 荷香污糟雞︰雞有荷葉香味,但係都幾油,因為雞皮出左的油,會積左係荷葉上面,但佢同紅棗呢個配搭唔錯...價錢唔算好平,小食都幾貴...基本上,服務都唔錯,加茶加得好密,食物都好快到...食物的水準都算中上....我會再幫親...
Read full review

第一次跟家人到此晚餐,屋企人話食評都唔錯,試下啦...

叫左以下食物︰

- 生煎包︰包的皮好軟熟,D 餡OK,唔算太油,個底可以煎 lone 少少
- 小籠包︰賣相麻麻地,個整好似散散地咁,但肉汁好甜,個皮唔算太厚或太薄,但係食得出D肉係較肥的... 味道都OK
- 羅白絲酥︰呢個幾好味,唔油
- 擔擔面︰呢個係最好食,唔會得麻醬味,有少少辣,好食...
- 梨山醬骨煲︰呢個味都好好食,好送飯,我以為梨山係酸汁,但原來係有豉油、蒜頭..
- 荷香污糟雞︰雞有荷葉香味,但係都幾油,因為雞皮出左的油,會積左係荷葉上面,但佢同紅棗呢個配搭唔錯...

價錢唔算好平,小食都幾貴...

基本上,服務都唔錯,加茶加得好密,食物都好快到...

食物的水準都算中上....

我會再幫親...
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-09-25
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$80 (Dinner)
Level3
32
0
2010-09-18 7 views
同朋友都早放工,早d黎食dinner,早d食,唔駛等位.雞絲粉皮: 一般貨色,青瓜仲有d老.鴨舌: 個汁好味鳳爪: 呢個最好味,炆到好入味,連墊底既花生都好好味! 馬拉盞炒雜菜: 好香口,不過有d辣.嫩雞煨麵: 個湯太杰,d麵又太糊,唔好食.小籠包: 正常水準總括黎講都ok,尤其係叫左咁多野都唔駛300,合理.
Read full review
同朋友都早放工,早d黎食dinner,早d食,唔駛等位.
雞絲粉皮: 一般貨色,青瓜仲有d老.
鴨舌: 個汁好味
鳳爪: 呢個最好味,炆到好入味,連墊底既花生都好好味!

馬拉盞炒雜菜: 好香口,不過有d辣.
嫩雞煨麵: 個湯太杰,d麵又太糊,唔好食.
小籠包: 正常水準

總括黎講都ok,尤其係叫左咁多野都唔駛300,合理.
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-09-17
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$145 (Dinner)
Recommended Dishes
  • 鳳爪
Level4
2K
91
2010-09-03 20 views
1-9-2010一早聽聞呢度係利苑 (http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/commentdetail.htm?commentid=1859914) 開出來的, 加上早前 C 太太話「幾好食」, 是日收工約朋友到銅記食 dinner walk-in 嚟試試. 叫了 3 款點心/包點, 2 款小食及 1 碟菜, 再一人一凍飲, 但整體印象認真麻麻:-「爽脆海蜇」: 海蜇夠爽的 (但其實海蜇要「唔腍」有幾難呢?), 浸喺一灘酸得很的汁液內, 食落有輕微的辣味, 亦酸到阿媽都唔認得, 幾大煞風景.五香牛腱: 醬汁聞落夠香, 味道濃甜, 不過朋友話覺得「個 aftertaste 好似豬腳薑」, 係醬汁混了鎮江醋產生的「幻覺」? 牛腱薄切, 亦鬆化入味, 幾好食, 亦係全晚唯一好食的一味...蘿白絲酥餅: 據聞係利苑「名物」, 不過我未食過利苑的點心, 無得比較. 呢度的做得酥化, 唔會好「粉」又唔油膩, 蘿白絲餡料亦清甜爽身, 不過最幾少吓 , 感覺有點到喉唔到肺.蒸銀絲卷: 做得熱辣鬆軟, 蘸埋煉奶都幾難唔好食, 不過邊有「絲」呀, 絕對唔係
Read full review
1-9-2010

一早聽聞呢度係利苑 (http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/commentdetail.htm?commentid=1859914) 開出來的, 加上早前 C 太太話「幾好食」, 是日收工約朋友到銅記食 dinner walk-in 嚟試試. 叫了 3 款點心/包點, 2 款小食及 1 碟菜, 再一人一凍飲, 但整體印象認真麻麻:-

「爽脆海蜇」: 海蜇夠爽的 (但其實海蜇要「唔腍」有幾難呢?), 浸喺一灘酸得很的汁液內, 食落有輕微的辣味, 亦酸到阿媽都唔認得, 幾大煞風景.

五香牛腱: 醬汁聞落夠香, 味道濃甜, 不過朋友話覺得「個 aftertaste 好似豬腳薑」
, 係醬汁混了鎮江醋產生的「幻覺」?
牛腱薄切, 亦鬆化入味, 幾好食, 亦係全晚唯一好食的一味...

蘿白絲酥餅: 據聞係利苑「名物」, 不過我未食過利苑的點心, 無得比較. 呢度的做得酥化, 唔會好「粉」又唔油膩, 蘿白絲餡料亦清甜爽身, 不過最幾少吓
, 感覺有點到喉唔到肺.

蒸銀絲卷: 做得熱辣鬆軟, 蘸埋煉奶都幾難唔好食, 不過邊有「絲」呀, 絕對唔係銀絲卷來的.


「原湯野菌娃娃菜」: 原湯帶點雞湯 feel, 不過「畢」多兩啖覺得有點太鹹; 炒過的「野菌」係靈芝菇 (?), 食落「鑊氣」十足, 不過有一半都帶苦味, 真係
娃娃菜就又老又硬又有渣, 難食到爆
竟然湯浸蔬菜都可以咁難食, xyz 佢吖


小籠包 (4 隻): serve 時皮已穿, 搞到湯汁漏晒落底, 當然立即叫佢換過一籠; 不過第二客係好厚皮, 餡料粗嚡, 食落唔鮮唔香, 唯一好處係湯汁夠熱份量亦 ok, 真係


飲品就係凍圓肉雪梨茶, 飲落唔會太甜, 無酸澀味, 不過實在太唔夠凍了.

朋友的凍豆漿據聞係自家製, 雖然唔滑, 但甜度唔高, 豆味亦 ok, 算啦.

食物麻麻, 店員們態度亦麻麻, 連環境都係又迫又嘈 ventilation 又差的, 感覺都幾「茶餐廳」.

埋單每人約 $130, 比已經唔太喜歡的翡翠拉麵 (http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/commentdetail.htm?commentid=115016) 更唔喜歡, 喊面絕對授之無悔, 後會無期!
全餐得五香牛腱好食
19 views
0 likes
0 comments
海蜇夠爽, 但點解 d 汁要酸成咁?
22 views
0 likes
0 comments
利苑「名物」算酥脆, 不過蘿白絲少咗 d 喎
15 views
0 likes
0 comments
又一長型饅頭
22 views
0 likes
0 comments
炒過的菇帶苦味, 娃娃菜就又硬又老, 有幾「娃娃」!?
21 views
0 likes
0 comments
第一客穿底漏湯, 換過呢客就皮厚餡粗, xyz 佢吖!
29 views
0 likes
0 comments
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-09-01
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$130 (Dinner)
Recommended Dishes
全餐得五香牛腱好食
  • 推乜鬼? 何來美食?
Level2
27
0
2010-08-30
近期學校放假, 好想襯機會試菜, 難得有假期!2010-8-6 小籠包(26) 新鮮熱辣,皮薄餡靚,肉既份量適中又有湯 雞絲粉皮(42) 一點不像涼拌, 點解噤咸? 不夠花生醬及青瓜, 雞好"鞋" 2010-8-28椰皇燉鷓鴣(58) 應該是減了材料 (只得一隻鷓鴣腳, 一片鷓鴣肉, 幾條代蟲草, 3粒杞子, 2小粒瘦肉, 好在d 湯都幾甜 青芥末汁伴螺花(46) 不會再有下次 生煎鍋貼(28) 等了很久才有, 因阿姐不知台號, 送錯給別台, 味道好好, 我鍾意
Read full review
近期學校放假, 好想襯機會試菜, 難得有假期!
2010-8-6
小籠包(26) 新鮮熱辣,皮薄餡靚,肉既份量適中又有湯

雞絲粉皮(42) 一點不像涼拌, 點解噤咸? 不夠花生醬及青瓜, 雞好"鞋"



2010-8-28
椰皇燉鷓鴣(58) 應該是減了材料 (只得一隻鷓鴣腳, 一片鷓鴣肉, 幾條代蟲草, 3粒杞子, 2小粒瘦肉, 好在d 湯都幾甜

青芥末汁伴螺花(46) 不會再有下次

生煎鍋貼(28) 等了很久才有, 因阿姐不知台號, 送錯給別台, 味道好好, 我鍾意
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-08-06
Waiting Time
20 Minutes (Dine In)
Spending Per Head
$78 (Lunch)
Recommended Dishes
  • 小籠包
Level4
2010-08-28 71 views
Luxury Brands developing a more affordable line of clothing or accessories seems like a good way to expand its market, or target audience, After all, fashion magazines are becoming more popular among audience at increasingly younger age groups, 'Style at every age' is finally being realized, and while trendsetters may not want to admit, it's great to see that those who think they can create styles, or influence their change with details and trends, are developing variations or alternatives to re
Read full review
Luxury Brands developing a more affordable line of clothing or accessories seems like a good way to expand its market, or target audience, After all, fashion magazines are becoming more popular among audience at increasingly younger age groups, 'Style at every age' is finally being realized, and while trendsetters may not want to admit, it's great to see that those who think they can create styles, or influence their change with details and trends, are developing variations or alternatives to reach a larger mass. It doesn't just happen in fashion, clearly, to food as well.

Lei Bistro is the latest line for the Lei Garden Restaurant chains. With affordability and casual atmosphere in mind, the first establishment opened in Causeway Bay, right at the basement of Times Square, where the hungry traffic is huge throughout the day. If there is one thing about Lei Bistro that goes hand in hand with its luxury counterparts, it's the need for reservations. You need one to get in, unless you don't mind waiting outside. But then if you don't mind waiting, there are a few things you shouldn't mind when you get there -- the ambience, service, and food quality, three of the most obvious elements in a restaurant's visit.

Without further judgment, Lei Bistro is more laid-back, but that also involves the owners trying to maximize their already narrow dining space with more tables, each closer to each other. The lack of elbow room also evolves into having your next table neighbors eavesdropping into your conversation, or not, because the place is a hub of noise -- you may not be able to hear what the others are talking about, or for that matter, the person right opposite you.

The menu is decidedly mixed -- and much similar to the case in many restaurants trying to be more than they can be, no matter what brand the restaurant's developed from, Lei Bistro is trying very hard to change that. It's signature 冰燒三層肉 can be sold out early afternoon. The quality wasn't bad, but for a signature product to be in such short supply is an alarming fact -- were they trying to make it look more popular than it does? 油炆筍尖 are not very thin bamboo shoots, braised in plenty of brown sauce which is overseasoned and over-glazed. The slim bamboo shoots went from crunchy to soggy, with what may be an overdose of oyster sauce in the marinade they're cooked in. 蜜汁火方 (配蝴蝶包) is a failed attempt for a well established brand to redeem itself. The ham, despite softened through repeated steaming, was soft with bits of fat still clinging on each slice, the honey sauce it's cooked in was truly too sweet, almost like biting into a hunk of ham followed by 10 repeated licks of an artificial-sweetener-laden lollipop. It's so sweet it tasted fake. The "butterfly buns" were soft, and what's up with the deep-fried soybean sheets that went with? Can they be any less generous about it? (despite them being crunchy throughout)

The only thing 'dirty' about 荷香蒸污糟雞 is its name. Bony chunks of marinated chicken steamed inside a lotus leaf parcel with red jujubes, shreds of preserved mustard tubers, and dried shiitaki mushrooms were tender and juicy, with a strong welcoming aroma of lotus leaf in every bite of the chicken, if only the dish could be less oily -- the chicken was sitting in a shallow pool of oil. 故鄉濃茶燻釜米鴨 came from the barbecued department. It fell right into the deadly mistake as the smoky flavour overrode everything else. The duck no longer took on any flavour other than a slightly burnt taste. If you try to tell me the duck was smoked to death, I would've believe you too -- the smokiness truly was too much, even for someone who loves tea dearly!

韭黃炒鱔糊 came in a small portion, but that usually didn't matter, but instead you can find more chives than eel, which came in dark miniature curls that were slightly too tough. The chives were too tough though and grassy to taste. 飄香荷葉飯 is the only dish we couldn't complain -- the full lotus leaf parcel was packed with moist rice granules, while bits of dried shiitaki mushrooms and chicken bits were perfectly diced and moist. The aroma of lotus leaf was strong but not too dominating. If there was anything, the serving portion was way too big for this one, as a group of three each had 2 bowls full. Desserts are not a strong suit here, but claiming originality is Lei Bistro's 楊枝甘露. Being original is one thing, being up to par is another. This concoction was too thin and too sweet. Despite featuring chunks of mangoes with translucent pearls of tapioca, the shreds of pomelo were too tough and bitter to taste. It was truly disappointing to think that the restaurant which created the same dessert could differ so much from the original restaurant, is it what restaurants are trying to do -- toning down the prices by lowering the quality of their food?

Food quality aside, for any brand intending to keep its reputation, a keen eye on the management is important. It took forever for anyone to get their teacups refilled, to a point that diners wanted to refill by themselves. The service staff seemed to be in a rush walking around trying to be accomodating instead of actually doing it. It's equally a pain to see that despite the placemats are artfully designed, some of the plates and bowls were already chipped (please see image) despite the restaurant has opened for no more than a few weeks. To claim that a restaurant group is trying to reach a wider target audience by lowering the prices is fine, but to lower the quality of anything that goes out of the kitchen isn't. The food isn't all bad, but it's the careless bits here and there that makes diners wish that they'd been in the original Lei Garden Restaurants instead, as one couldn't help but wonder, when the new Lei Garden opens later this year in the same building, will the bistro be as popular as now?

Tidy Placement Settings
34 views
0 likes
0 comments
Bamboo Shoots too soft (lack a snapping crunch)
36 views
0 likes
0 comments
Tightly wrapped Lotus Leaf Parcel
29 views
0 likes
0 comments
Filled to the top, with good lotus leaf aroma
33 views
0 likes
0 comments
Chicken and Rice both Moist
49 views
1 likes
0 comments
Tough Chives and miniature eel pieces
19 views
0 likes
0 comments
Honey glaze simply too sweet (a little fake)
26 views
0 likes
0 comments
Buns (white) warm and light
28 views
0 likes
0 comments
Tea-smoked Duck: Smoky aroma too pungent
68 views
1 likes
0 comments
Another lotus leaf dish: tender chicken but too oily
25 views
0 likes
0 comments
Disappointingly thin concoction
24 views
1 likes
0 comments
A quality with Class?
13 views
0 likes
0 comments
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Waiting Time
15 Minutes (Dine In)
Type of Meal
Lunch
Recommended Dishes
Tidy Placement Settings
Tightly wrapped Lotus Leaf Parcel
Filled to the top, with good lotus leaf aroma
Chicken and Rice both Moist
Buns (white) warm and light
  • 飄香荷葉飯
Level4
2010-08-26 32 views
與女友在UA時代由夢境回到現實世界,第一件就是知道肚餓,未吃飯我們立即走去先醫肚,就近近地來了這所也挺火,又人氣的利苑延伸小店,看看又好不好吃。近十時仍是要等位,幸好也是不消十分鐘已經有位了,與女友安頓好之後,坐下第一件事就是發覺此處勁嘈!我不是想投訴,因為來得這些地方也是在預算之內,只不過在此希望可以如實告知讀者。之後我們都研究餐牌了,除了印刷精美的餐牌,店家另有一張如點心紙的落單紙,印得密麻麻的有齊飯麵、點心、頭盤及小菜,我們圈好之後就交給店員。先來的是冷盤醉雞,但我取了一件雞一吃,為何雞是暖暖的,莫非醉雞不是冷盤來的嗎?這個感覺已叫人覺得奇怪,加上浸着雞的汁很油底,看來此雞不是煮好了用酒浸,而是用上雞湯煮好了雞之後,連帶一點雞汁再加點酒了事,個人感覺有點難以置信,雞肉如不蘸上大量的汁吃是丁點酒味也沒有,雞肉入口雖然嫩滑,但其實又偏腍且散,看來都是冷藏貨,最突出反而是那雞皮,透薄而皮下又不多脂肪,最後忍不住吃了數塊呢。之後來的是女友主打的嫩雞煨麵,但我一見到個麵又是令人打個突,繼上回在夏麵館吃到的假煨麵之後,是日又是同一情況,可知煨麵是淮揚菜的一種麵食,其製法是將麵條以高湯煮製很久
Read full review

與女友在UA時代由夢境回到現實世界,第一件就是知道肚餓,未吃飯我們立即走去先醫肚,就近近地來了這所也挺火,又人氣的利苑延伸小店,看看又好不好吃。

近十時仍是要等位,幸好也是不消十分鐘已經有位了,與女友安頓好之後,坐下第一件事就是發覺此處勁嘈!我不是想投訴,因為來得這些地方也是在預算之內,只不過在此希望可以如實告知讀者。之後我們都研究餐牌了,除了印刷精美的餐牌,店家另有一張如點心紙的落單紙,印得密麻麻的有齊飯麵、點心、頭盤及小菜,我們圈好之後就交給店員。

先來的是冷盤醉雞,但我取了一件雞一吃,為何雞是暖暖的,莫非醉雞不是冷盤來的嗎?這個感覺已叫人覺得奇怪,加上浸着雞的汁很油底,看來此雞不是煮好了用酒浸,而是用上雞湯煮好了雞之後,連帶一點雞汁再加點酒了事,個人感覺有點難以置信,雞肉如不蘸上大量的汁吃是丁點酒味也沒有,雞肉入口雖然嫩滑,但其實又偏腍且散,看來都是冷藏貨,最突出反而是那雞皮,透薄而皮下又不多脂肪,最後忍不住吃了數塊呢。

之後來的是女友主打的嫩雞煨麵,但我一見到個麵又是令人打個突,繼上回在夏麵館吃到的假煨麵之後,是日又是同一情況,可知煨麵是淮揚菜的一種麵食,其製法是將麵條以高湯煮製很久很久,使麵條充份吸收湯汁之外,其麵質變成很腍,而其湯也因此變得較濁,是麵煮得太久之下的麵粉溶了狂湯內,而不是求其煮好個麵之後,加回生粉在湯中了事,始終在香港,所有人都太過急功近利,連煮個煨麵都要唸縮數慳時間慳煤氣,所以當然不會好吃,啖湯本身又不太有肉香,菜又少而雞肉就更少,配料之中還敬送鑊燶,哎!

另也要吃一點纖維的,點了的是原湯泡田園青蔬,比起油鹽水泡田園青蔬貴近六十個巴仙,但原來此道簡單點說,就是一道多了點液體的炒莧菜,所謂的湯只有丁點,而且是一點也沒肉味,那跟油鹽水有何分別?擺明車馬搵笨,菜入口雖未至有渣,但對我這些牙齒健在的人吃入口仍覺粗糙,令人感覺難受。

點心點了碧綠素菜包,一客三件每隻都相當飽滿,咬下一口,包身鬆軟,唯是包香可以再多一點,可惜飽滿的包身原來也是因為包夠厚肉,素菜餡其實一點也不多,入口很清,餡用的油不多,但就吃得出有點薑味,店家除了數粒冬菇粒及菜碎之外,更加了丁點很細的薑碎,感覺奇妙,而不介意餡少的食客可能都會認為此包不錯,但個人如想吃多點包,倒不如以更便宜的價錢買饅頭吃更好。

最後就是店家推介的冰燒三層肉,一個九宮格般的九件燒腩仔,賣到要六十八元究竟有什麼巴閉的地方,從其橫切面看,果然也是分明的五層峰,而且層皮又夠脆,可是脆得來過硬,是硬脆而不是鬆脆,加上豬肉那五層之中那兩層肥峰入口沒有爆油的幸福感,瘦峰就有咬口而味道適中,再蘸上美味的芥辣醬吃,總括而言是不差的,但跟真正好吃仍有點距離,要上七元五角得咁細件,看來是不太值得。

雖然說不上吃了很多東西,但至少是麵食、點心、頭盤及名物的燒肉也點了來吃,怎說都算有點代表性吧,加上連集團自認有名的燒肉也是不礙如是,又如何叫人心悅誠服呢?一向本人對利苑的印象都不錯的,但此條戰線開出來令人有感,原來利苑係咁咋,恐怕未能打開多條戰線以提高集團的市佔率之前,利苑這個品牌的商譽已經有可能受到影響,咁又何必呢?
近十時仍是要等位,幸好也是不消十分鐘已經有位
60 views
0 likes
0 comments
不要被這個品牌騙到啊!
12 views
0 likes
0 comments
小菜小吃都真的是很多選擇
48 views
0 likes
0 comments
也有非常多湯品及點心的選擇
46 views
0 likes
0 comments
冷盤醉雞莫非不是冷盤來的嗎?
13 views
0 likes
0 comments
雞肉入口雖然嫩滑,但其實又偏腍且散
12 views
0 likes
0 comments
嫩雞煨麵又是一個假煨麵
19 views
0 likes
0 comments
麵條沒有吃煨麵的感覺
19 views
0 likes
0 comments
原湯泡田園青蔬原來是多了點液體的炒莧菜
24 views
0 likes
0 comments
冰燒三層肉層皮脆得來過硬,兩層肥峰入口沒有爆油感
29 views
0 likes
0 comments
碧綠素菜包包身鬆軟,唯是包香可以再多一點
16 views
0 likes
0 comments
除數粒冬菇粒及菜碎之外,只有丁點很細的薑碎,感覺奇妙
25 views
0 likes
0 comments
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-08-13
Waiting Time
10 Minutes (Dine In)
Spending Per Head
$130 (Dinner)
Recommended Dishes
近十時仍是要等位,幸好也是不消十分鐘已經有位
不要被這個品牌騙到啊!
小菜小吃都真的是很多選擇
也有非常多湯品及點心的選擇
碧綠素菜包包身鬆軟,唯是包香可以再多一點
Level3
48
0
2010-08-21 3 views
以平價"利苑"之名, 聲稱品質味道不變. 但價錢真的唔算好平 (一般酒樓價錢), 但服務極差, 先是有出面等叫票時, 我仲差兩步行唔切, 佢已經按另一張票號, 仲同我講話已經按了2次無人應, 當時咁多人阻住點行? 入到去好似無侍應咁 (全部都是年輕, 無咩經驗那種), 點心選擇少, 無茶選, 每次都要叫侍應加水, d位又迫, 好似茶餐廳, 一d都唔似酒樓, 唔好坐亦坐唔耐!! 個個食完即走, 好知上去魚翅城飲茶好過.同利苑差十倍!! 唔好以為執到寶. 唔會再去~~
Read full review
以平價"利苑"之名, 聲稱品質味道不變. 但價錢真的唔算好平 (一般酒樓價錢), 但服務極差, 先是有出面等叫票時, 我仲差兩步行唔切, 佢已經按另一張票號, 仲同我講話已經按了2次無人應, 當時咁多人阻住點行?

入到去好似無侍應咁 (全部都是年輕, 無咩經驗那種), 點心選擇少, 無茶選, 每次都要叫侍應加水, d位又迫, 好似茶餐廳, 一d都唔似酒樓, 唔好坐亦坐唔耐!! 個個食完即走, 好知上去魚翅城飲茶好過.

同利苑差十倍!! 唔好以為執到寶. 唔會再去~~
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Date of Visit
2010-08-21
Waiting Time
20 Minutes (Dine In)
Spending Per Head
$70 (Lunch)
Level2
14
0
2010-08-21 15 views
新店開張,真係好多人等位。我地兩個人叫左﹣小籠包 ﹣ 皮簿但唔易穿,內裡好多汁雞絲粉皮 ﹣ 不過不失,但有點辣雙芹魚餃 ﹣ 皮好 “痴”,一般上海粗炒 ﹣ OK,好快就凍左蔥油餅 ﹣ 呢個最好,唔油但好鬆脆D 傳菜唔係好熟手,其他 WAITER 就好好。
Read full review
新店開張,真係好多人等位。

我地兩個人叫左﹣

小籠包 ﹣
皮簿但唔易穿,內裡好多汁

雞絲粉皮 ﹣ 不過不失,但有點辣

雙芹魚餃 ﹣ 皮好 “痴”,一般

上海粗炒 ﹣ OK,好快就凍左

蔥油餅 ﹣
呢個最好,唔油但好鬆脆

D 傳菜唔係好熟手,其他 WAITER 就好好。
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-08-19
Waiting Time
30 Minutes (Dine In)
Spending Per Head
$120
Recommended Dishes
  • 小籠包
Level2
10
0
2010-08-21 110 views
上來OPENING RICE,見到好多食家都話呢間唔多好,但其實利小館係利苑集團的新開菜館,就同朋友一齊來試試! 早一日已經BOOK左位,所以唔洗等,大枱最入,但坐得好舒服,唔以近門口位的細枱坐得咁辛苦!第一輪我地先叫椰皇燉鷓鴣 好清甜,無油,好正 ($58)峰巢芋盒 好食過美心酒樓,唔油,仲好脆 ($22)上海粗炒 師父手藝好好,吃到尾多數會好咸,但呢個一D都唔咸 ($54)小籠飽 : 皮薄,肉汁好鮮,一定要叫 ($26)第二輪 : 蘿蔔絲酥餅 翡翠上海拉麵整呢個好難吃,都唔明WHY咁多人仲叫,但呢度水準好高,皮唔厚, 蘿蔔絲好甜之餘仲係外面脆,內暖,吃完你就知咩叫好吃! ($22)麻香蔥油餅都OK,SO FAR SO GOOD LA ($24)荷葉蒸污糟雞呢個要叫白飯,因為上面有D冬茱,送白飯會好D ($68)荷葉飯 D飯好企身,粒粒都好香,D餸係底,吃時要用匙係底將D餸同飯MAX埋,會仲好吃($65)第三輪: 楊枝金露好夠凍,好甜($24)蛋白杏仁茶好香杏仁,有D粒粒的杏仁粒,唔錯($22)擂沙湯丸呢個係最差,呢皮好厚,仲唔多熟,大粒無用啊,都唔好吃
Read full review
上來OPENING RICE,見到好多食家都話呢間唔多好,但其實利小館係利苑集團的新開菜館,就同朋友一齊來試試!
早一日已經BOOK左位,所以唔洗等,大枱最入,但坐得好舒服,唔以近門口位的細枱坐得咁辛苦!
第一輪我地先叫
椰皇燉鷓鴣
好清甜,無油,好正 ($58)
峰巢芋盒
好食過美心酒樓,唔油,仲好脆 ($22)
上海粗炒
師父手藝好好,吃到尾多數會好咸,但呢個一D都唔咸 ($54)
小籠飽 :
皮薄,肉汁好鮮,一定要叫 ($26)
第二輪 :
蘿蔔絲酥餅
翡翠上海拉麵整呢個好難吃,都唔明WHY咁多人仲叫,但呢度水準好高,皮唔厚, 蘿蔔絲好甜之餘仲係外面脆,內暖,吃完你就知咩叫好吃! ($22)
麻香蔥油餅
都OK,SO FAR SO GOOD LA ($24)
荷葉蒸污糟雞
呢個要叫白飯,因為上面有D冬茱,送白飯會好D ($68)
荷葉飯
D飯好企身,粒粒都好香,D餸係底,吃時要用匙係底將D餸同飯MAX埋,會仲好吃($65)
第三輪:
楊枝金露
好夠凍,好甜($24)
蛋白杏仁茶
好香杏仁,有D粒粒的杏仁粒,唔錯($22)
擂沙湯丸
呢個係最差,呢皮好厚,仲唔多熟,大粒無用啊,都唔好吃,失望!($18)
整體都唔錯,所以大家可以去試下,最好BOOK左位先,因為門口位比較窄,會坐得唔舒服!

椰皇燉鷓鴣
43 views
0 likes
0 comments
峰巢芋盒
27 views
0 likes
0 comments
上海粗炒
27 views
0 likes
0 comments
小籠飽
27 views
0 likes
0 comments
蘿蔔絲酥餅
48 views
0 likes
0 comments
麻香蔥油餅
48 views
0 likes
0 comments
荷葉蒸污糟雞
38 views
0 likes
0 comments
荷葉飯
29 views
0 likes
0 comments
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-08-17
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$150 (Dinner)
Recommended Dishes
椰皇燉鷓鴣
峰巢芋盒
上海粗炒
小籠飽
蘿蔔絲酥餅
麻香蔥油餅
荷葉蒸污糟雞
荷葉飯
Level4
2010-08-14 37 views
近來食運都尚算不俗,有食友在這店食完後的評語是完全水準以下,而我倆來過兩次,整體質素中等,部份食物水準偏高。第一次致電訂座九時半兩位,對方說九時不設訂座請 walk-in,因為如果晚飯時間第一轉的客人未買單交檯也沒法準時讓我倆入座,... 嗯,那是否完全不設電話訂座?非也,第一轉晚飯時間六時多七時可以訂座,明白了。不過食友說現在星期五、六、日很旺,店子在這幾天不設電話訂座。 第一次光顧點了酸辣湯拉麵 $44,上檯時見賣相不大吸引,以為麵條一定是腍身糊口,但出乎意料之外麵條不會很腍,而湯雖不很辣但酸味適中。 上海小籠包 $26 四只。皮不易破帶點柔韌,雖頂部也有少許「頂太豐」,但肉餡鮮味湯汁豐沛,因為湯汁味道不會太濃重,我喜歡這個更勝「蘇浙匯」的小籠包。 香茅烤豬仔腿骨 $98,肚餓點菜容易眼闊肚窄,這晚點了兩款肉類兩款澱粉質,太多了吃的撐肚皮。炸漿雖然脆口但太厚很飽滯,豬仔骨的肉很腍身但沒味道,主要靠蘸同上的酸辣香茅汁,這個不推介。 荷香污糟雞 $68,雞肉十分嫩滑但不像有梳打化,醬汁味道香甜但滲不進雞肉,反而同蒸的冬菇絲吸收了醬油和紅棗絲的味道很好吃。 始創楊枝金露 $24 (7
Read full review
近來食運都尚算不俗,有食友在這店食完後的評語是完全水準以下,而我倆來過兩次,整體質素中等,部份食物水準偏高。第一次致電訂座九時半兩位,對方說九時不設訂座請 walk-in,因為如果晚飯時間第一轉的客人未買單交檯也沒法準時讓我倆入座,... 嗯,那是否完全不設電話訂座?非也,第一轉晚飯時間六時多七時可以訂座,明白了。不過食友說現在星期五、六、日很旺,店子在這幾天不設電話訂座。

第一次光顧點了酸辣湯拉麵 $44,上檯時見賣相不大吸引,以為麵條一定是腍身糊口,但出乎意料之外麵條不會很腍,而湯雖不很辣但酸味適中。

上海小籠包 $26 四只。皮不易破帶點柔韌,雖頂部也有少許「頂太豐」,但肉餡鮮味湯汁豐沛,因為湯汁味道不會太濃重,我喜歡這個更勝「蘇浙匯」的小籠包。

香茅烤豬仔腿骨 $98,肚餓點菜容易眼闊肚窄,這晚點了兩款肉類兩款澱粉質,太多了吃的撐肚皮。炸漿雖然脆口但太厚很飽滯,豬仔骨的肉很腍身但沒味道,主要靠蘸同上的酸辣香茅汁,這個不推介。

荷香污糟雞 $68,雞肉十分嫩滑但不像有梳打化,醬汁味道香甜但滲不進雞肉,反而同蒸的冬菇絲吸收了醬油和紅棗絲的味道很好吃。

始創楊枝金露 $24 (7 月 31 日前特價 $12),第一次吃楊枝金露是在沙田「利苑酒家」,那時剛出來工作不久,覺得這甜湯新穎又好吃,比傳統的百年好合、腐竹白果糖水等有趣和美味。之後楊枝金露在很多酒家、甜品店也有供應,但我仍然覺得「利苑」做的最好吃。

第二次再來,這次的小籠包皮很黏筷子,幸好也不易破,而餡兒的湯汁依舊美味。

古法秘製茶燻鴨 $68,比「蘇浙匯」的樟茶鴨更美味,鴨肉帶茶燻香之餘嫩滑又滿有肉汁,我倆一邊吃一邊想,愛吃鴨的某位友人一定會喜歡這道菜。

清炖雞湯拉麵 $46,雞湯很鮮味而且很清澈。麵條另上,雖把雞湯倒入去但仍然是兩者各自為政,我倆都認為下次乾脆點一盅淨雞湯更好。

楊枝金露仍然很美味,這晚的芒果味比上一次更濃郁 ^^。因為網上對這店評語很參差,希望你們運氣好,吃到的質素比我倆的更好。
酸辣湯拉麵
32 views
0 likes
0 comments
小籠包
20 views
0 likes
0 comments
18 views
0 likes
0 comments
香茅烤豬仔腿骨
32 views
0 likes
0 comments
荷香污糟雞
26 views
0 likes
0 comments
古法秘製茶燻鴨
37 views
0 likes
0 comments
清炖雞湯
43 views
0 likes
0 comments
楊枝金露
29 views
0 likes
0 comments
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Date of Visit
2010-07-15
Waiting Time
10 Minutes (Dine In)
Spending Per Head
$120
Recommended Dishes
小籠包
古法秘製茶燻鴨
清炖雞湯
楊枝金露
  • 小籠包,古法秘製茶燻鴨,清炖雞湯,楊枝金露