23
10
11
Level3
38
0
not for hungry lunchers!
2011-04-28 212 views
I've been here twice for dinner and twice for lunch. 1st time dinner was when it first opened. had their tasting menu. the food was good but not on the level of the likes of amber/pierre. portions were decent. 2nd dinner ordered a la carte and the main I ordered (the pigeon) was exquisite but portion a bit small for a la carte. I was very happy however given there were a couple of months between the 2 dinners, I had expected some new dishes but seemed their signature dishes were the same.
Read full review
I've been here twice for dinner and twice for lunch. 1st time dinner was when it first opened. had their tasting menu. the food was good but not on the level of the likes of amber/pierre. portions were decent. 2nd dinner ordered a la carte and the main I ordered (the pigeon) was exquisite but portion a bit small for a la carte. I was very happy however given there were a couple of months between the 2 dinners, I had expected some new dishes but seemed their signature dishes were the same. I decided not to go back for dinner after a long time as the menu didn't change much.

Lunch originally seemed like a good deal. Choose any 2 or 3 course from the lunch a la carte menu for around $360. 1st lunch I had wine and bread so it was decent. 2nd time back, I didn't have wine and maybe because what I ordered I was left feeling hungry still. My lunch mates on both occasions complained lack of food.

To elaborate on the small portion, the main course was smaller than most appetizers at most restaurants. It was quite appalling. Service was OK but not up to standard for a high end restaurant.

Haven't been back since. But it's Ok to try once or twice.
(The above review is the personal opinion of a user which does not represent OpenRice's point of view.)
  • Recommend
    Recommended
  • Report
Post
DETAILED RATING
Taste
Decor
Service
Hygiene
Value
Dining Method
Dine In
Spending Per Head
$400 (Lunch)